<<
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

DIBATTITI

3° Congresso SEPI Italia . Quale scienza per la psicoterapia? Roma, 18-19-20 Aprile 2008  Programma  . Sommario . Dibattito pre-congressuale  .  Dibattito post-congressuale

------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Constructionism, Hermeneutics, and Phenomenology in Qualitative Psychotherapy Research – SEPI Lisbon Pre-Conference Discussion.

Edited byTullio Carere-Comes

2007, June -July

An intense and passionate on-line discussion has taken place from June 2, to July 2, 2007, among Michael Basseches, Daniel Fishman, and me, in preparation for our Symposium on “Understanding Commonalities and Differences in Psychotherapy: The Role of Qualitative Research”—SEPI Lisbon Conference, Sunday July 8, 2007. The Symposium will be preceded by a presentation by Michael Basseches and Michael Mascolo on Saturday morning on “Developmental Analysis of Psychotherapy Process (DAPP): Case Illustration of Methodological Advances in a Common Factors Developmental Approach to the Study of Psychotherapy Effectiveness, Similarities, and Differences”.

Part one >> Part two >>

------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Positivism, hermeneutics, and phenomenology

Tullio Carere-Comes, editor

2007, September - October

Editor's note. I have edited here my own contributions to the JAPA Online Faculty Seminar in which Luyten, Blatt and Corvelyn's 2006 paper " Minding the Gap Between Positivism and Hermeneutics in Psychoanalytic Research", Japa 4, 2, was discussed. The discussion lasted from September 15 to October 16, 2007. My decision to collect here my own contributions is justified by the fact that in each intervention I quote or summarize other authors' interventions to which I am responding. Therefore, the series of my contributions can be read as an essay in which I expose my ideas on positivism, hermeneutics, and phenomenology in a cross-talk with the other contributors.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------

A Dialogue with Irwin Hoffman on constructivism and phenomenology

Tullio Carere-Comes, editor

2007, September - November

Editor's note. The dialogue between Hoffman and me began insidethe JAPA Online Faculty Seminar in which Luyten, Blatt and Corvelyn's 2006 paper " Minding the Gap Between Positivism and Hermeneutics in Psychoanalytic Research", Japa 4, 2, was discussed from September 15 to October 16, 2007. In fact, what happened inside the Seminar between Hoffman and me could hardly be called a dialogue – a clash could be a more proper word. The true dialogue developed back-channel, after the conclusion of the Seminar. The first part of this document begins with two substantial Hoffman's contributions to the JAPA Seminar, on which I drew for my comment of October 9. On October 13 came Hoffman lively rebuttal of my comment, followed by my reply the day after, and the final, conciliatory Hoffman's comment. The second part includes the dialogue proper that developed between us from October 20 to November 4.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------

2° Congresso SEPI Italia Firenze 24-26 Marzo 2006 Dibattito pre-congressuale . Dibattito post-congressuale

------------------------------------------------------------------------------

1° Congresso SEPI Italia Milano, 16 Marzo 2002 . Dibattito pre-congressuale e post-congressuale

------------------------------------------------------------------------------